Free Trade Area of the Americas - FTAA

español

 
Ministerial
Declarations
Trade Negotiations
Committee
Negotiating
Groups
Special
Committees
Business
Facilitation
Civil
Society
Trade&Tariff
Database
Hemispheric
Cooperation
Program

Home Countries Sitemap A-Z list Governmental Contact Points

 
 


FTAA - NEGOTIATING GROUP ON DISPUTE SETTLEMENT


QUESTIONNAIRE


URUGUAY

1.  International Agreements
 

a.  Is the jurisdiction a party to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, done at New York on 10 June 1958 (New York Convention). If so, are there any reservations? Name the domestic law that implements these commitments.
 

Uruguay is a party to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, to which it acceded without declaration or reservation. The Convention was approved by Decree Law No. 15.229, of December 11, 1981, and the instrument of accession was deposited on March 30, 1983.
 

b.  cIs the jurisdiction a party to the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States, done at Washington on 18 March 1965 (ICSID Convention)? Is there a domestic implementing law? Is the jurisdiction a party to any bilateral investment treaties providing for settlement of investment disputes between a state and a national of another state?

1.  Uruguay is a party to the International Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States (Washington, 1965). This Convention was approved by Law No. 17.209, of September 24, 1999.  The instrument of ratification was deposited on August 9, 2000, and took effect on September 8 of that same year.

2.  Uruguay has signed a number of bilateral agreements for the reciprocal promotion and protection of investments:

Country Signing Approval In force since
Belgium-Luxembourg. Brussels, 04.11.91 Law Nº 16.856 of 22.08.97 23.04.99
Canada Ottawa, 29.10.97 Law Nº 17.102 of 16.05.99 02.06.99
Chile Santiago, 26.10.95 Law Nº 17.059 of 21.12.98 10.02.99
China Beijing, 02.12.93 Law Nº 16.881 of 21.10.97 01.12.97
Czech Republic Montevideo, 26.09.96 Law Nº 17.270 of 19.10.00 29.12.00
France Paris, 14.10.93 Law Nº 16.818 of 16.04.97 04.07.97
Germany Bonn, 04.05.87 Law Nº 16.110 of 25.04.90 29.06.90
Hungary Budapest, 25.08.89 Law Nº 16.184 of 21.05.91 01.07.92
Italy Rome, 21.02.90 Law Nº 16.857 of 22.08.97 02.03.98
Netherlands The Hague, 22.09.88 Law Nº 16.182 of 21.05.91 01.08.91
Poland Montevideo, 02.08.91 Law Nº 16.598 of 14.10.94 21.10.94
Portugal Montevideo, 25.07.97 Law Nº 17.210 of 24.09.99 03.11.99
Romania Montevideo, 23.11.90 Law Nº 16.396 of 29.07.93 29.09.93
Spain Madrid, 07.04.92 Law Nº 16.444 of 15.12.93 06.05.94
Sweden Stockholm, 17.06.97 Law Nº 17.211 of 24.09.99 01.12.99
Switzerland Berne, 07.10.88 Law Nº 16.176 of 30.03.91 22.04.91
United Kingdom London, 21.10.91 Law Nº 16.819 of 16.04.97 01.08.97
United States 15.12.82 D-Law Nº 15.427 of 19.07.83 21.07.83

Moreover, Uruguay has subscribed to other bilateral investment agreements with Israel, Malaysia, Mexico, Panama, and Venezuela, that have not yet entered into force.


c.
  Is the jurisdiction a party to the Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration, signed in Panama on 30 January 1975 (Panama Convention)?  Is there a domestic implementing law?

Uruguay is party to the Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration of 1975.  This Convention was approved by Decree Law No. 14.534 of June 22, 1976, and the instrument of ratification was deposited on April 25, 1977.


d.  
Is the jurisdiction a party to any other international agreement related to international commercial arbitration.

1. Uruguay is also party to the Inter-American Convention on Extraterritorial Validity of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards of 1979.  This instrument was approved by Decree Law No. 14.953 of December 12, 1979, and the instrument of ratification was deposited on May 15, 1980.
 

2. Within MERCOSUR, Uruguay signed the “International Commercial Arbitration Agreement of MERCOSUR” and the “Agreement on International Commercial Arbitration among MERCOSUR, Bolivia and Chile” on July 23, 1998, in the city of Buenos Aires.  Both instruments are currently under consideration in Parliament. Neither has yet come into force.
 

Similarly, specifically on investments, Uruguay signed the “Protocol for the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments in MERCOSUR” (Colonia, January 17, 1994) and the “Protocol on the Promotion and Protection of Investments from non-MERCOSUR States” (Buenos Aires, August 5, 1994), approval of which is currently being considered by Parliament.  The latter instrument has now been in force between Argentina and Paraguay since April 13, 1996.
 

2.   Arbitration

a. What is the source of law for international commercial arbitration within your jurisdiction?

In the case of countries with which Uruguay is not bound by treaties or conventions, the following domestic sources apply for international commercial arbitration:

1.             Articles 502 and 543 of the General Code of Procedures (Law No. 15.982 of October 18, 1988, hereinafter GCP), which provides as follows:

Article 502.  Enforcement of foreign arbitration.

Awards issued by foreign arbitration tribunals can be enforced in Uruguay in accordance with treaties or laws on the enforcement of foreign judgments, where applicable.

Article 543.  Foreign arbitral awards.
      The provisions of this Chapter [on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments] shall  be applicable to awards granted by foreign arbitral tribunals wherever appropriate.

2.   Law 16.906, which contains rules relating to declaration of national interest, and the promotion and protection of investments made by national and foreign investors in national territory, includes the following rule on dispute settlement [Article 25]:

Any dispute concerning the interpretation or application of this law, arising between the State and an investor that has obtained the Promotional Declaration (“Declaración Promocional”) from the Executive Power,, may be submitted, at the choice of either  party, to one of the following procedures:

A)    to the competent court

B.)   to the arbitral tribunal, which will always rule in accordance with law, as established in Articles 480 to 502 of the General Code of Procedures.

When a choice has been made to submit the dispute to one of these procedures, such choice will be definitive.

The provisions set out in the preceding paragraphs shall be applicable with respect to foreign investors in the absence of a treaty, protocol or international convention on dispute settlement in force when the dispute arises.

3. Articles 472 to 507 of the GCP regulating the different aspects of the arbitration process.
 

b.   Does the law contain different rules for domestic and international arbitration?
 

 Settlements referred to in Articles 472 to 507 of the GCP, mentioned above, relate to domestic arbitration. Nonetheless, the same can also be applied to international arbitration.  The most significant difference regulating domestic and international arbitration seems to be at the stage of award enforcement, in that for international arbitration, in conformity with the remission to Article 543 of the GCP, the enforcement of the foreign arbitral award would require the procedure of exequatur.
 

c.        Are there limitations on the types of disputes that may be arbitrated?
 

Article 472 of the GCP establishes generally: “Any individual or collective dispute may be submitted
by the parties for resolution by an arbitration tribunal, unless this is expressly prohibited by law.

The law recognizes the full legality of awards issued by arbiters appointed either by the parties or by a judicial court, as well as those handed down by tribunals established by arbitration chambers to which the parties submit.”

Nonetheless, Article 476 of the GCP provides that “issues on which settlement is prohibited may not be submitted to arbitral proceedings.”  Under Article 223 (ii) of the GCP, “the tribunal will approve any conciliation or settlement relating to disposable assets, as long as it adheres to the substantive requirements and nature of the law in litigation …” Therefore, issues on which the parties may not freely decide, may not be submitted to arbitration (e.g. the marital status of persons).
 

b. Does the law contain different rules for domestic and international arbitration?

Settlements referred to in Articles 472 to 507 of the GCP, mentioned above, relate to domestic arbitration. Nonetheless, the same can also be applied to international arbitration. The most significant difference regulating domestic and international arbitration seems to be at the stage of award enforcement, in that for international arbitration, in conformity with the remission to Article 543 of the GCP, the enforcement of the foreign arbitral award would require the procedure of exequatur.


c. Are there limitations on the types of disputes that may be arbitrated?

Article 472 of the GCP establishes generally: “Any individual or collective dispute may be submitted by the parties for resolution by an arbitration tribunal, unless this is expressly prohibited by law.

The law recognizes the full legality of awards issued by arbiters appointed either by the parties or by a judicial court, as well as those handed down by tribunals established by arbitration chambers to which the parties submit.”

Nonetheless, Article 476 of the GCP provides that “issues on which settlement is prohibited may not be submitted to arbitral proceedings.” Under Article 223 (ii) of the GCP, “the tribunal will approve any conciliation or settlement relating to disposable assets, as long as it adheres to the substantive requirements and nature of the law in litigation …” Therefore, issues on which the parties may not freely decide, may not be submitted to arbitration (e.g. the marital status of persons).


d. Does the law specify rules for arbitration or do the parties have autonomy to set their rules?

Article 477 of the GCP provides that the arbitral agreement among other things shall contain:

“4) Arbitration procedure. If nothing is stated on this particular issue, the provisions of Article 490 shall apply.
5) Mention of whether the arbitration is in law or in equity; if nothing is specified in this regard, arbiters shall rule in equity.
6) Deadline for issuing the award.”

Article 490, entitled “Freedom of procedure” states: “The parties may agree on the procedure they consider most appropriate.

If nothing is stated in this regard, or if there is no special provision in the procedure indicated, the provisions established for ordinary proceedings in this Code shall be applied by the arbitrators.(…)”

Finally, Articles 503 to 507 of the GCP regulate “single arbitration,” in which the parties agree to submit the disputed issue to resolution by one person, proceeding in accordance with Articles 480 to 502, or in a less formal way (regulated in Articles 504 and 505 of the GCP)


e. What is the role of the courts during an arbitration? May courts intervene prior to or during the arbitration process?

1. The ordinary courts may intervene before the arbitral process:

(i) At the stage of the constitution of the tribunal:

Article 480, paragraphs 1 and 4 of the GCP state: “480.1 Unless the parties appoint a single arbiter or agree that one shall be appointed by the court, the number of arbiters shall always be three or five.
480.4 Arbiters may be appointed either in the arbitral clause , or in the agreement, or in a subsequent act. In addition, appointment of arbiters by a third party or by the court may also be agreed.
If the parties do not reach agreement on the designation of arbiters, the appointment will be made by the court.”

ii) Rejection of arbiters:

According to paragraphs 2 and 4 of Article 485 of the GCP, “485.2 Arbiters appointed by the court or by a third party, may be rejected within ten days following notification of the appointment or knowledge of subsequent facts that give rise to rejection.
485.4 (…)The court mentioned in Article 494 shall be competent to decide on the rejection.”
According to Article 494: “… the court that would have heard the case in the absence of an arbitration agreement will have competency.”

iii) Preliminary proceedings:

“Proceedings prior to arbitration, such as evidence produced before the hearing, interim measures and procedures aimed at formalizing the agreement to arbitrate, will be settled before the competent court, as provided in Article 494” (Article 488).
 

2. The ordinary courts may also intervene during and even after the arbitral process:

i) At the evidence stage:

Article 492 provides as follows: “The presentation of evidence before the arbiters will be governed by the procedures of this Code, unless otherwise agreed by the parties.
However, the arbiters will seek collaboration from the ordinary courts when witnesses refuse to present themselves voluntarily to testify, when reports are required that can only be obtained through court order or when assistance from law enforcement is necessary.”

ii) Issues excluded from arbitration:

In addition, “if, during the hearing, a document is alleged to be criminally fraudulent, or issues are raised that are not susceptible to arbitration, the record will be transferred to the ordinary courts and the arbitration process will be suspended in the meantime.” (Article 493)

iii) Arbiters’ fees:

Article 498.2 provides that “Also before the same court, [referred to in the aforementioned Article 494] arbiters may request regulation of their fees, which will be fixed on the basis of the Bar Association’s scale of fees, and in accordance with procedures regulating lawyers’ and prosecutors’ fees.”


f. Can the courts grant interim relief pending the outcome of an arbitration?

Yes, in the case of the aforementioned Article 488 of the GCP (see answer 2.e.1.iii)


g. Does the law require citizenship or a particular bar membership for participation in an arbitral proceeding, as arbiter or representative of a party?

1. Requirements to be an arbiter
According to Article 480.2 of the GCP, “Anyone older than 25 years of age may be an arbiter, provided in full possession of his civil rights”, and according to 480.3: “neither prosecutors nor court clerks may be appointed arbiters.”

2. Representation
Article 2 of Law 16.995 of August 26, 1998, envisages the need for assistance from legal counsel from start to finish in “any conciliation procedure held in a judicial, administrative, mediation or arbitration center.”

The practice of law is regulated in Articles 137 to 150 of Law No. 15.750 of June 24, 1985, a copy of which is attached.


h. Does the law require that the proceedings be conducted in a particular language?

The GCP does not contain express provisions regarding the language in which the arbitral proceedings are to be carried out. However, Article 65 of this Code establishes in a general sense that “in all procedural steps Spanish must be used. When it is necessary to hear someone who does not speak Spanish, the court shall appoint an interpreter.” Accordingly, for procedures that have to be carried out before the ordinary courts of the Republic, this requirement must be fulfilled. In addition, bearing in mind the provisions of the aforementioned Article 490 of the GCP, according to which the rules of ordinary proceedings shall apply for anything not provided for by the parties or the arbiters, if the parties have not established anything in this regard in the arbitration agreement, the arbitral procedure should be carried out in Spanish.

In the private sector, Article 7 of the Arbitration Regulation of the Conciliation and Arbitration Center, International Court of Arbitration for MERCOSUR, of the Uruguayan Stock Exchange, states:

“1)Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the language of arbitration will be the language of the arbitral clause, except where the arbitral court decides otherwise, in the light of observations made by the parties and the circumstances of the arbitration.
2) The arbitral court may require attached documents in support of the written claim or reply, as well as any other document or complementary instruments presented during the proceedings in their original language, to be accompanied by a translation into the language of the arbitration.”


i. Does the law have mandatory choice of law provisions?

No.


j. Does the arbitration law prescribe rules for decision making by the arbiters and the form of an arbitration award?

This point can be answered by repeating the reply given in 2 d). Article 477.5 of the GCP states that the parties shall decide — in principle— whether arbitration shall be in law or in equity. In the absence of any pronouncement by the parties, the arbiters shall decide in equity.

It is also the responsibility of the parties to decide the time period for issuing the award (Articles 477.6 and 496 of the GCP); failing this, it must be decided within 90 working days as from the first proceedings of the arbitral tribunal, unless the parties agree to suspend proceedings. Article 496.3 provides that the award shall be decided by majority vote. If a majority cannot be achieved, the award shall be granted on issues on which there is a majority, with judgment being reserved on the other points until the parties appoint a new member of the tribunal

k. Is the confidentiality of arbitral proceedings and awards protected by law?

There are no express provisions on this point in the General Code of Procedures.

It may be relevant to mention that, in the private sector, the Arbitration Rules of the Conciliation and Arbitration Center, International Court of Arbitration for MERCOSUR of the Uruguayan Stock Exchange, contains the following rules on confidentiality:

Article 46. Confidentiality of the existence of arbitration

1) Except where necessary in relation to judicial recourse concerning the arbitration process, or in the process of enforcing an award, a party may not unilaterally disclose to third parties information relating to the existence of the arbitral process, unless obliged to do so by law or by a competent authority.

2) Without prejudice to paragraph 1 above, a party may disclose to a third party the names of the parties involved in the arbitration process and the damages claimed, in order to satisfy any obligation of good faith and equity contracted with a third party.

Article 47. Confidentiality of information disclosed during the arbitral process

1) Any evidence presented by a party or a witness in the arbitration process shall be considered confidential, provided that such evidence contains information that is not in the public domain. No party gaining access to such information as a result of participation in the arbitration process shall use or disclose that information to third parties, under any circumstances, without the consent of the parties or by order of a competent court.

2) For the purposes of the present Article a witness named by one of the parties shall not be considered a third party. If a witness is granted access to evidence or other information obtained in the arbitration in order to prepare his/her testimony, the party naming that witness shall be responsible for the latter maintaining the same degree of confidentiality as is required of this party.

Article 48 Confidentiality of the award

1) The parties shall respect the confidentiality of the award and this may only be disclosed to third parties if:

a) The parties so authorize;
b) It becomes public knowledge as a result of proceedings before a national court or other competent authority, or
c) It has to be disclosed in order to comply with a legal requirement imposed on a party, or to establish or protect the legal rights of a party with respect to third parties.

Article 49 Maintenance of confidentiality by the arbiter and Center

1) Unless agreed otherwise by the parties, the Center and the arbiter shall uphold the confidential nature of the arbitration process, of the award and, insofar as it contains information that is not public knowledge, of any evidence disclosed during the arbitration process, unless required by judicial action in relation to the award or imposed by law.

2) Without prejudice to the above, the Center may include information on the arbitration process in the annals of jurisprudence or in the global statistics that appear in publications relating to its activities, provided such information does not enable the parties or the particulars of the dispute to be identified.
 

l. On what grounds will the courts set aside or decline to enforce an award?

In the case of foreign arbitral awards originating in States with which Uruguay is not bound by Convention or Treaty, by remission of Article 543, Article 539 of the Code shall be applicable. This sets out the formal, procedural and substantive requirements which the judgment (or arbitral award) must satisfy, and over which —in the event of a sentence—the Supreme Court must exercise control:

1. Formal requirements:
a. The award must satisfy the external formalities needed to be authentic in its State of origin; and

b . Both the award and the attached documentation must be duly translated—where appropriate—and legalized in accordance with the legislation of Uruguay, except where the award is transmitted through diplomatic or consular channels or through the corresponding administrative authorities.

2. Procedural requirements:
a. That the sentencing court has jurisdiction in the international domain to hear the case, in accordance with its law, except where the issue is of exclusive jurisdiction of the national courts;

b. That the defendant has been notified or legally subpoenaed and due defense of the parties has been ensured;

c. That the decision has become definitive in its State of origin.

3 Substantive requirement: That it is not manifestly contrary to the essential principles of international public order of the Republic of Uruguay.

To request enforcement of the award, Article 539.2 of the GCP requires presentation of authenticated copies of the award, together with the elements necessary to evidence notice to the defendant and due defense of the parties, as well as authenticated copy of certification that the award is definitive.


m. What is the procedure for the enforcement of an award?

1. Domestic arbitral awards
The procedure for enforcement of domestic arbitral awards is regulated in Article 498.1 of the GCP. Judges with competency for enforcement, in accordance with the aforementioned Article 494, are those that would have heard the case in the absence of an arbitration agreement. The enforcement procedure is set out in Article 371 to 401 of the GCP (see copy attached).

2. Foreign arbitral awards.
In cases where there is no treaty or convention (Articles 503 and 543 of the CGP), Articles 537-541 (on recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments) shall apply to arbitral awards. The enforcement of a foreign arbitral award ordering one of the parties to give or do or not do something, must be submitted to the Supreme Court of Justice (Article 541.2). Once the request has been made, service of process shall be made on the party against which the enforcement is being sought, providing that party 20 days to respond. Subsequently, the award shall be reviewed by the examining magistrate and a ruling made, with no further appeal possible. If the execution is enforced, it shall be submitted to the competent court so that it may undertake procedures appropriate to the nature of the award (enforcement process envisaged in Articles 371-401 of the CGP mentioned previously).


n. Please list any institutions available within your jurisdiction that provide international commercial arbitration services. Provide internet address where available.

In the private sector, there is the Conciliation and Arbitration Center, of the Court of International Arbitration for MERCOSUR, of the Uruguayan Stock Exchange (www.arbitraje.com.uy).

Article 1 of the “Arbitration Rules” of this institution, defines the latter as “the body created by the Stock Exchange within its organization, with the aim of administering national and international conciliation and arbitration processes submitted to it, and appointing conciliators and arbiters when the parties have so agreed.”


3. Alternative Forms of Dispute Resolution (ADR)

a. Are other forms of alternative dispute resolution (mediation, conciliation) available for the resolution of commercial disputes within your jurisdiction?

Articles 293 to 298 of the GCP regulate the conciliation mechanism, which is used for resolving civil, commercial and labor disputes.

In the private sector, there is also the conciliation mechanism at the Conciliation and Arbitration Center, of the Court of International Arbitration for MERCOSUR of the Uruguayan Stock Exchange. This mechanism is regulated in the “Conciliation Rules.”


b. Does the law or do the courts mandate or encourage the use of ADR in commercial disputes? Are there any legal impediments to using ADR for the resolution of commercial disputes?

Article 293 of the GCP establishes, as a general rule, the requirement to convene a hearing to attempt conciliation with the future defendant, who shall be summoned at his domicile. The exceptions to this rule are set out in Articles 293.2 and 294 of the GCP:

1 Procedures not carried out through the ordinary channels (this would include eviction, enforcement, appeal for relief (amparo) and interim relief, expropriation and urgent seizure, and procedures relating to insolvency, agreement with creditors, default, bankruptcy and judicial liquidation of corporations, as well as cases involving divorce and legal separation) (Article 294.3 to 294.5, 294.7, 294.8 and 294.10);

2. Procedures of voluntary jurisdiction or any procedure that does not involve resistance or denial from any party, unless a dispute arises (Article 294.2);

3. Family cases in departments where specialized courts exist for such issues (Article 294.11)

4. When a claim exists in a pending process for the same case (Article 294.1);

5. When the domicile of the defendant is unknown (Article 293.2)

6. When the defendant is an unknown person (idem.)

7. When the defendant is domiciled outside the place of the trial (idem.)

It should be added that in labor proceedings, conciliation is carried out through the administrative channel (Article 294.6 and Article 10 of Decree Law 14.188 of April 5, 1974, and complementary provisions)

Under Article 490 of the GCP, conciliation must be attempted even prior to the arbitration process, and arbiters are free to propose any type of conciliation mechanism.

c. Can courts enforce agreements to mediate or use other forms of non-binding dispute resolution in commercial disputes?

Article 297, paragraphs 1 and 2 state: “297.1 Agreed conciliation and agreements made by the parties before the court on that occasion, shall have the same force as final judgment between grantors and their successors by general right.

297.2 Enforcement shall be sought before the competent court.”

d. Are there any organizations that specialize in ADR for commercial disputes not already mentioned?

In the domain of ordinary justice, Law No. 16.995 of August 26, 1998, states in Articles 4 and 5:

Article 4 - The Supreme Court is empowered to make the changes needed to establish courts with exclusive competency in conciliation, deciding the number and category that it deems appropriate, as well as other aspects relating to the organization and functioning of such courts.

Article 5 – “The Supreme Court shall regulate the prior conciliation regime held before conciliation judges, and may issue instructions concerning the way hearings shall be held.”

At the present time, however, the conciliation process is carried out before Justices of the Peace, in accordance with Article 255 of the Constitution of the Republic.

In the private domain, there is the Conciliation and Arbitration Center, of the International Court of Arbitration for MERCOSUR of the Uruguayan Stock Exchange. Article 1 of its “Conciliation Rules” states that this body has been created by the Stock Exchange within its organization “in order to administer national and international conciliation and arbitration processes submitted to it, and appoint conciliators and arbiters when the parties so agree.”


e. What rules govern confidentiality and admissibility of evidence in other proceedings?

The GCP does not contain any express provisions in this regard.

In the private domain, Article 8 of the “Conciliation Rules” of the Conciliation and Arbitration Center, of the International Court of Arbitration for MERCOSUR of the Uruguayan Stock Exchange establishes the following:

“ 1) The confidential nature of conciliation must be respected by all participants.
1) The parties undertake not present as evidence or otherwise, in any judicial arbitral proceeding:

a) Points of view expressed or suggestions made by any party relating to a possible settlement.
b) Proposals made by the conciliator.
c) The fact that one of the parties may have indicated a willingness to accept a settlement proposal offered by the conciliator.”


4. Legal Sources and References

In addition to the references above is there an authoritative Internet site containing up-to-date information on dispute resolution facilities available in this jurisdiction?

Internet site of the Conciliation and Arbitration Chamber of the Uruguayan Stock Exchange: www.arbitraje.com.uy


5. - Bibliography

Please list respected reference works relating to arbitration and ADR in your jurisdiction.

 
countries sitemap a-z list governmental contact points