Free Trade Area of the Americas - FTAA

español

 
Ministerial
Declarations
Trade Negotiations
Committee
Negotiating
Groups
Special
Committees
Business
Facilitation
Civil
Society
Trade&Tariff
Database
Hemispheric
Cooperation
Program

Home Countries Sitemap A-Z list Governmental Contact Points

 
 


FTAA - NEGOTIATING GROUP ON DISPUTE SETTLEMENT

QUESTIONNAIRE

Panama

1. International Agreements

a. Is the jurisdiction a party to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, done at New York on 10 June 1958 (New York Convention). If so, are there any reservations? Name the domestic law that implements these commitments.

The Republic of Panama is a signatory to the 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, and did not enter any reservation. It ratified the Convention through Law No. 5, of 25 October 1983.

b. Is the jurisdiction a party to the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States, done at Washington on 18 March 1965 (ICSID Convention)? Is there a domestic implementing law? Is the jurisdiction a party to any bilateral investment treaties providing for settlement of investment disputes between a state and a national of another state?

The Republic of Panama is a member of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States (ICSID Convention). The Convention was implemented through Law 13, of 3 January 1996, which was published in Issue No. 22.947 of the Official Gazette, 8 January 1996, and the ratifying documents were deposited on 8 April 1996.

Panama has also signed the following bilateral investment agreements:

1. TREATY BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CONCERNING THE TREATMENT AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

- Signed at Washington D.C., 27 October 1982
- Approved by Law No. 12, of 27 October 1983
- Official Gazette No. 20.380, published 29 August 1985
- Exchange of instruments of ratification on 30 April 1991.
- Entered into force on 30 May 1991

2. TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF FRANCE CONCERNING THE TREATMENT AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

- Signed at Panama, 5 November 1982
- Approved by Law No. 2 of 25 October 1983
- Official Gazette No. 20.357, published 26 July 1985
- Diplomatic Notes for the entry into force of the Treaty exchanged on 30 December 1983 and 3 September 1985
- Entered into force on 3 October 1985

3. TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND CONCERNING THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

- Signed at Panama on 7 October 1983
- Approved by Law No. 3 of 25 October 1983
- Official Gazette No. 20.362, published 2 August 1985
- Exchange of instruments of ratification 7 November 1985
- Entered into force 7 November 1985

4. TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE SWISS CONFEDERATION CONCERNING THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS.

- Signed at Panama on 19 October 1983
- Approved by Law No. 4, of 25 October 1983
- Official Gazette No. 20.370, published 14 August 1985
- Diplomatic Notes for the entry into force of the Treaty exchanged on 19 October 1983 and 22 August 1985
- Entered into force on 22 August 1985

5. TREATY BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY CONCERNING THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF CAPITAL INVESTMENT

- Signed at Panama on 2 November 1983
- Approved by Law No. 16, of 12 December 1985
- Official Gazette No. 20.477, published 23 January 1986
- Exchange of instruments of ratification 10 February 1989
- Entered into force on 12 March 1989

6. TREATY BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE REPUBLIC OF CHINA CONCERNING THE TREATMENT AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

- Signed at Taipei on 26 March 1992
- Approved by Law No. 13 of 6 July 1992
- Official Gazette No. 22.075, published 10 July 1992
- Diplomatic Notes for the entry into force of the Treaty exchanged on 18 May and 14 July 1992
- Entered into force on 14 July 1992

7. TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA FOR THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS.

- Signed at Guatemala on 12 September 1996
- Approved by Law 39 of 14 November 1997
- Official Gazette No. 23.420, published 18 November 1997
- Diplomatic Notes for the entry into force of the Treaty exchanged on 11 November 1997 and 13 February 1998
- Entered into force on 13 February 1998

8. TREATY BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA FOR THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS

- Signed at Panama on 10 May 1996
- Approved by Law 2 of 13 January 1997
- Official Gazette No. 23.207, published 20 January 1997
- Diplomatic Notes for the entry into force of the Treaty exchanged on 3 February 1997 and 22 June 1998
- Entered into force on 22 June 1998

9. TREATY FOR THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE KINGDOM OF SPAIN

- Signed at Panama on 10 November 1997
- Approved by Law 43 of 1 July 1998
- Official Gazette No. 23.581, published 8 July 1998
- Diplomatic Notes for the entry into force of the Treaty exchanged on 20 and 31 July 1998.
- Entered into force on 31 July 1998.

10. TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA FOR THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS.

- Done at Panama on 27 January 1999
- Approved by Law No. 5, of 3 May 1999
- Official Gazette No. 23.793 published 11 May 1999
- Diplomatic Notes for the entry into force of the Treaty exchanged on 24 May and 14 July 1992
- Entered into force on 26 July 1999

11. TREATY BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CHILE FOR THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS.

- Done at Santiago, Chile on 8 November 1996
- Approved by Law 19, of 17 March 1998
- Official Gazette No. 23.504, published 19 March 1998
- Exchange of Diplomatic Notes for the entry into force of the Treaty 3 April, 1998, and 31 August, 1999
- Entered into force on 30 September 1999.

12. TREATY BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE ORIENTAL REPUBLIC OF URUGUAY FOR THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS.

- Done at Panama on 18 February 1998
- Approved by Law No. 81, of 23 November 1998.
- Official Gazette No. 23.686, published 4 December 1998
- Note: Pending the exchange of diplomatic notes for entry into force

13. TREATY BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE CZECH REPUBLIC FOR THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS.

- Done at Panama on 27 August 1999
- Approved by Law No. 11, of 14 June 2000
- Official Gazette No. 24.077 published 19 June 2000
- Exchange of Diplomatic Notes for the entry into force of the Treaty 23 June 2000 and 20 October 2000
- Entered into force on 20 October 2000

14. AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE PROMOTION OF INVESTMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

- Done at Panama on 19 April 2000
- Approved by Law No. 27 of 7 July 2000
- Official Gazette No. 24.093, published 11 July 2000
- Notification for entry into force 12 July 2000
- Entered into force on 12 July 2000
- Note: Replaces the Agreement on Guaranteeing Private Investment, entered into through an exchange of notes on 23 January 1961

15. PROTOCOL BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AMENDING THE TREATY CONCERNING THE TREATMENT AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS OF 27 OCTOBER 1982

- Signed at Panama on 1 June 2000
- Approved by Law No. 2 of 10 January 2001
- Official Gazette No. 24.210, published 15 January 2001

16. TREATY FOR THE RECIPROCAL PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE KINGDOM OF THE NETHERLANDS

- Signed at Panama on 28 August 2000
- Approved by Law No. 22 of 30 May 2001
- Official Gazette No. 24.315, 4 June 2001

17. TREATY BETWEEN THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA AND THE REPUBLIC OF KOREA CONCERNING THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF INVESTMENTS.

- Signed in Korea on 10 July 2001

c. Is the jurisdiction a party to the Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration, signed in Panama on 30 January 1975 (Panama Convention)? Is there a domestic implementing law?

The Republic of Panama is party to the 1975 Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration, which was approved through Law Number 11, on 23 October 1975.

d. Is the jurisdiction a party to any other international agreement related to international commercial arbitration.

The Republic of Panama has signed no agreement related to international commercial arbitration other than those listed above.

2. Arbitration

a. What is the source of law for international commercial arbitration within your jurisdiction? Please cite.

1- The Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration, approved through Law 11 of 23 October 1975.

2- Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, approved through Law No. 5 of 28 October 1983.

3- Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States.

4- Executive Order No. 5,issued 8 July 1999, “establishing the arbitral regime of conciliation and mediation arbitration regime.”

b. Does the law contain different rules for domestic and international arbitration?

In Panama there are no significant differences between the rules for domestic and international arbitration.

c. Are there limitations on the types of disputes that may be arbitrated?

According to Executive Order No. 5, Article 2, the following types of disputes may not be submitted to arbitration.

- Disputes arising with regard to matters not disposable at will by the parties
- Matters on which a court ruling has been issued and that become res judicata.

d. Does the law specify rules for arbitration or do the parties have autonomy to set their rules?

Article 3 of Law No. 5 stipulates that arbitration may be based on law or on equity. When it is based on law, the issue shall be resolved in accordance with rules of law and when it is based on equity, then it shall be resolved according to the best knowledge and belief of the arbitrator, and not subject to legal rules.

Without prejudice to the foregoing, Article 4 sets forth two scenarios for arbitration, institutionalized or on ad hoc, the article states the following:

- Ad hoc arbitration is carried out in accordance with the rules of procedure expressly set forth by the parties for the particular case, without reference to preestablished rules and at all times in conformity with Executive Order No. 5.

- Institutionalized arbitration is that carried out by an authorized arbitral institution in conformity with Executive Order No. 5 and chosen by the parties in the arbitration agreement or subsequent thereto. This arbitral institution is obliged to administer the agreement, in the manner provided in its by-laws or rules.

e. What is the role of the courts during an arbitration? May courts intervene prior to or during the arbitration process?

The procedural provisions of the arbitration agreement allow for the court of ordinary jurisdiction to decline jurisdiction in favor of the tribunal of agreed jurisdiction and the immediate submission of the dossier to the arbitral tribunal.

State, municipal or provincial regulating bodies or agencies, as the case may be, that are to take part by settling disputes between the parties should also decline jurisdiction if there is a prior arbitration agreement on the same issues.

Nonetheless, the courts of competent jurisdiction may respond to a request from any of the parties for interim relief to guarantee the results of the process, without this being understood as a withdrawal from the agreed arbitration.

f. Can the courts grant interim relief pending the outcome of an arbitration?

Executive Order No. 5, Article 11, states that courts of competent jurisdiction, at the request of the parties and to ensure the validity of the results of the process, may implement interim relief. A court of law implementing such relief must communicate its ruling to the arbitrators or the established arbitral institution or to the corresponding designated authority, within ten days of executing the order.

Article 24 of Executive Order No. 5, in turn, states that, failing an agreement to the contrary by the parties, the arbitral tribunal, at the request of one of the parties, may adopt the temporary measures or interim relief that it deems necessary to ensure that the objective of the process is fulfilled, for which purpose the support of the sitting circuit judge shall be requested.

g. Does the law require citizenship or a particular bar membership for participation in an arbitral proceeding, as arbiter or representative of a party?

Executive Order No.5, Article 3, specifies that when the arbitration is based on law, arbitrators must be practicing attorneys. Unless the parties object, foreign arbitrators may be named for distinct types of cases. In any event, for arbitration based on law, a foreign arbitrator must fulfill the requirement of having a degree or a doctorate in law.

h. Does the law require that the proceedings be conducted in a particular language?

Article 20 of Executive Order No. 5 states that the proceedings shall be conducted in the language agreed on by the parties or in the language chosen in accordance with the applicable procedural rules or, in the absence thereof, in the language determined by the arbitral tribunal. When the parties are Panamanian, the language shall always be Spanish.

i. Does the law have mandatory choice of law provisions?

The law does any have any mandatory choice of law provisions.

j. Does the arbitration law prescribe rules for decision making by the arbiters and the form of an arbitration award?

Law No. 5, Article 25, states that the arbitral tribunal shall apply rules of law if the arbitration is based on law and its own free judgment if the arbitration is based on equity. In the case of international commercial arbitration, the procedures outlined in Article 43 of the Executive Order shall be followed; moreover, in all cases the provisions of the contract and business practices considered relevant shall be taken into account.

Regarding rules on form of award, Law No. 5, Article 29, stipulates the minimum form of the award. Regarding arbitration based on law, it states that the awards must be reasoned awards.

k. Is the confidentiality of arbitral proceedings and awards protected by law?

Executive Order No. 5 makes no mention of the confidentiality of the proceedings. It states that awards shall be notified to the parties in the manner specifically agreed by them in the applicable regulations.

l. On what grounds will the courts set aside or decline to enforce an award?

Foreign awards shall be recognized and enforced in Panama pursuant to the treaties and conventions to which the Republic of Panama is a party and, in the absence of such agreements, in accordance with the terms set forth in Law No. 5, Chapter VI, which deals with the recognition and enforcement of Awards.

m. What is the procedure for the enforcement of an award?

A final arbitral award shall be enforced by the Civil Circuit Court Judge with jurisdiction over the place of issuance of the award, through the procedure provided for final judicial judgments.

The written request for enforcement shall be accompanied by a certified copy of the agreement and of the award.

The enforcing judge shall serve notice of this request to the other party and send copies thereof within 15 days. The served party may oppose the enforcement request, although in so doing it may assert only that an appeal for annulment is pending. In such an event, the party in question must present the written appeal or demonstrate the existence of a judgment for annulment, with a certified copy of the judgment.

In the absence of such conditions, the judge shall order that the judgment be enforced. No order issued by the judge in this phase shall be subject to appeal.

If, pursuant to Law No. 5, an award that is issued in Panama is considered to have international force and the parties, either on their own behalf or through the applicable regulations, have waived their prerogative to request an appeal for annulment, the obtainment of the exequatur from the Fourth Court of General Affairs of the Supreme Court of Justice in the manner prescribed for foreign awards (Article 38 of Executive Order No. 5) shall be necessary for the enforcement of the award.

According to Article 42 of Executive Order No. 5 the Fourth Court of General Affairs of the Supreme Court of Justice of Panama shall be the court of competent jurisdiction for the recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award.

A party requesting recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award must submit, in addition to the written request, the following documents:

1. Duly authenticated original or certified copy of the arbitral award.
2. Duly authenticated original or certified copy of the arbitration agreement.
3. Official translation, if the arbitration was conducted in a language other than Spanish.

n. Please list any institutions available within your jurisdiction that provide international commercial arbitration services. Provide internet address where available.

The Conciliation and Arbitration Center of Panama (Centro de Conciliación y Arbitraje de Panamá), headquartered at the Chamber of Commerce, Industries and Agriculture (Cámara de Comercio, Industrias y Agricultura). Its Internet address is (www.panacamara.com).

3. Alternative Forms of Dispute Resolution (ADR)

a. Are other forms of alternative dispute resolution (mediation, conciliation) available for the resolution of commercial disputes within your jurisdiction?

Title II, Chapters I and II of Executive Order No. 5, issued in 1999, provides for alternative forms of commercial dispute resolution, such as conciliation and mediation.

b. Does the law or do the courts mandate or encourage the use of ADR in commercial disputes? Are there any legal impediments to using ADR for the resolution of commercial disputes?

Both options are based on autonomous choice; hence, their use is not mandatory, since these are alternative mechanisms for resolving trade disputes.

Matters that may be subject to settlement, dismissals, and negotiation, and those that are regulated may be submitted to conciliation and mediation.

c. Can courts enforce agreements to mediate or use other forms of non-binding dispute resolution in commercial disputes?

Executive Order No. 5 states that when a dispute is brought before the courts, mediation may take place at any time or at any stage of the proceedings.

d. Are there any organizations that specialize in ADR for commercial disputes not already mentioned?

The Conciliation and Arbitration Center of Panama (Centro de Conciliación y Arbitraje de Panamá), headquartered at the Chamber of Commerce, Industries and Agriculture.

e. What rules govern confidentiality and admissibility of evidence in other proceedings?

Regarding mediation, Executive Order No. 5, Article 56, states the following:

At the initiation of the mediation, the mediator and the parties must have previously signed a confidentiality agreement ensuring the following:

- That the contents of the preparatory activities, conversations, and partial agreements are absolutely confidential. Hence, the mediator may not disclose the contents of the discussions nor of the partial agreements between these parties, and, consequently, the mediator is bound by professional secrecy.

- That the parties may not relieve the arbitrator of his obligation to abide by the confidentiality obligation, and that neither a statement nor a confession from the parties or from the mediators on what took place or was said at the mediation hearing or hearings shall have probative value.

4. Legal Sources and References

In addition to the references above is there an authoritative Internet site containing up-to-date information on dispute resolution facilities available in this jurisdiction?

All the relevant information on legislation and references concerning the subject matter at hand can be found at the following Internet address:

www.panacamara.com/centro-conciliacion/leyes.html

5. - Bibliography

Please list respected reference works relating to arbitration and ADR in your jurisdiction.

Boutin, G. Del Arbitraje Comercial. Editorial Mizrachi y Pujol. 2001 edition, 340 pp.

Berrío-Lemm, Vladimir. Requisitos de validez del Arbitraje. March 2001. Published on the Internet by Legalinfo-Panama (http://www.legalinfo-panama.com/articulos).

Muñoz Esquivel, Oliver. Naturaleza Jurídica de la Función de los Árbitros. November 2001, Published on the Internet by Legalinfo-Panama (http://www.legalinfo-panama.com/articulos).

Sánchez F., Flora E. La Mediación - Instrumento de Solución de Conflictos. February 2001. Published on the Internet by Legalinfo-Panama (http://www.legalinfo-panama.com/articulos)

 

 
countries sitemap a-z list governmental contact points